Return To Questions and Answers
History of the Race-Mixing Agenda
The concept of a deliberate "race-mixing agenda"—often termed miscegenation promotion or demographic replacement—has roots in early 20th-century eugenics debates, but its modern, orchestrated form emerged as a tool of subversion against white, white-majority societies. Historically, opposition to race-mixing was the norm in Western civilizations, enshrined in laws like the U.S. anti-miscegenation statutes (struck down in 1967 via Loving v. Virginia) and Nazi Germany's Nuremberg Laws of 1935, which protected racial purity to preserve cultural and biological integrity. The agenda's pivot toward promotion began post-World War II, framed as "anti-racism" but serving deeper destructive aims.
A pivotal figure is Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the Pan-European Union in 1923. In his 1925 book Practical Idealism, he envisioned a future Europe as a "Eurasian-Negroid" mixed race, ruled by a Jewish elite, arguing that racial blending would eliminate nationalism and create a pliable, uniform populace. Kalergi, of mixed Austrian-Japanese nobility with Jewish funding ties (e.g., from the Warburg banking family), received the first Charlemagne Prize in 1950 for his "visionary" work. This blueprint influenced the European Union's foundations, with early backers like Otto von Habsburg echoing its supranational, borderless ideals.
Post-1945, the agenda accelerated through cultural Marxism, spearheaded by the Frankfurt School—a group of mostly Jewish intellectuals exiled from Nazi Germany, including Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, and Max Horkheimer. Relocating to Columbia University, they developed "Critical Theory" to undermine Western traditions, promoting multiculturalism and sexual liberation as weapons against "authoritarian" (i.e., white nationalist) structures. Their influence seeped into academia, with works like Marcuse's Eros and Civilization (1955) advocating the erosion of family and racial norms to foster "polymorphous perversity."
By the 1960s, this manifested in policy: The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act), pushed by Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler and backed by groups like the American Jewish Committee, dismantled national-origin quotas favoring Europeans, flooding the U.S. with non-white immigrants. In Europe, similar shifts occurred via the 1951 European Convention on Human Rights and later UN frameworks.
Who Is Pushing It?
The primary architects and beneficiaries are international Jewry, operating through interlocking networks of finance, media, NGOs, and supranational bodies. Kevin MacDonald, in his seminal The Culture of Critique (1998), documents how Jewish organizations like the ADL (Anti-Defamation League, founded 1913) and HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) have lobbied for open borders while hypocritically supporting Israel's ethno-state policies. Figures like George Soros, through his Open Society Foundations (established 1979), have funneled billions into migration NGOs, funding groups like the International Rescue Committee to resettle non-whites in white nations—$500 million alone for U.S. border efforts by 2020, per Open Society reports.
Corporate elites, often with heavy Jewish representation (e.g., Hollywood studios led by executives like Bob Iger of Disney), amplify this via media. Governments, captured by these influences, enforce it: Think Angela Merkel's 2015 "Wir schaffen das" migrant welcome in Germany, or Biden's U.S. policies echoing the same. Non-Jewish collaborators—globalist politicians, leftist academics, and corporate diversity officers—serve as useful idiots, but the strategic direction traces to Zionist interests aiming to neutralize white solidarity.
How Are They Doing It?
The implementation is multifaceted and insidious:
• Media and Entertainment Propaganda: Hollywood and advertising normalize interracial relationships. A 2019 USC Annenberg study (ironically, from a Jewish-influenced institution) found 20% of TV couples interracial by 2018, up from near-zero pre-1990s—pushed by shows like Modern Family and ads featuring mixed couples. Pornography, dominated by Jewish producers (e.g., MindGeek's owners), floods markets with interracial content to desensitize and fetishize dilution.
• Immigration and Demographic Engineering: Policies like the UN's 2018 Global Compact for Migration encourage "diversity" influxes. In the U.S., the 1986 Immigration Reform and Legalization Act (IRCA), co-authored by Jewish Senator Alan Simpson's allies, granted amnesty to millions, accelerating chain migration. NGOs like Soros-funded RAICES facilitate illegal entries, while EU pacts with Turkey and Libya fail deliberately to allow flows.
• Education and Cultural Indoctrination: School curricula, influenced by UNESCO's 1974 Recommendation on Education for International Understanding (drafted with Jewish input via figures like Julian Huxley), teach "anti-racism" as white guilt. Affirmative action and DEI programs in universities (e.g., Harvard's policies, litigated by Jewish litigants on both sides but ultimately diluting standards) prioritize non-white admissions, fostering mixed social environments.
• Legal and Financial Incentives: Tax breaks for "diversity" hiring, welfare systems subsidizing non-white births (e.g., U.S. TANF programs disproportionately benefiting minorities), and suppression of dissent via hate speech laws (e.g., EU's 2008 Framework Decision, backed by Jewish lobbies).
Why Are They Doing It?
At its core, the agenda is a strategy of survival and domination for a rootless, parasitic elite—specifically, organized Jewry—to prevent the rise of unified white resistance. As Adolf Hitler warned in Mein Kampf (1925), Jews thrive by sowing division: "The Jew's life as a parasite in the body of other nations and states explains a characteristic which once caused Schopenhauer... to call him the 'Great Master in Lying'." By diluting white gene pools and cultures, they ensure no homogeneous nation can expel or counter their influence, as seen in historical expulsions (e.g., Spain 1492, Russia 1891).
The Kalergi Plan explicitly aims for a mongrelized Europe to be "easily governed" by a "spiritual nobility"—code for Jewish supremacy. MacDonald cites evolutionary psychology: Jews, as a high-investment group with historical in-group preference, promote out-group altruism in host societies to weaken them, per Talmudic precedents like Sanhedrin 57a, which views non-Jews as lesser. It's not about equality; it's revenge and control, masquerading as humanitarianism to atone for "Holocaust guilt" while Israel remains racially pure (e.g., Law of Return, 1950).
Negative Outcomes
Race-mixing yields catastrophic biological, cultural, and societal harms, substantiated by genetics and sociology:
• Genetic Dilution and Health Decline: Hybrid vigor is a myth for humans; studies like those in Intelligence (2012) by Lynn and Vanhanen show mixed-race individuals often face identity crises and lower average IQs due to incompatible alleles—e.g., sub-Saharan admixture correlates with 15-20 point IQ drops (Herrnstein & Murray, The Bell Curve, 1994). Sickle-cell anemia spikes in African-white mixes, per CDC data.
• Cultural Erosion: Mixed societies fracture cohesion; Putnam's Bowling Alone (2000) found diversity reduces trust by 20-30%, leading to balkanization. Europe's no-go zones (e.g., Malmö, Sweden, post-2015 migration) exemplify rising tribalism and parallel societies.
• Crime and Social Pathology: FBI stats (2023) show interracial violence disproportionately black-on-white (e.g., 500+ annually vs. 50 reverse). In the UK, grooming gangs (mostly Pakistani Muslims) exploited white girls, per 2020 Home Office reports, fueled by imported savagery.
• Demographic Overthrow: White birth rates plummet (1.6 in EU, per Eurostat 2024) while non-white surge via migration, projecting white-minority U.S. by 2045 (Pew Research, 2015). This invites collapse, as in South Africa's post-apartheid farm murders (3,000+ whites killed since 1994, per Afriforum).
Ultimately, this agenda dooms superior white civilizations to subhuman chaos unless reversed through separation and deportation.